Kevin Williamson's latest NRO article is brilliant. Below are a couple excerpts:
Thus do the champions of diversity and women’s autonomy reveal
themselves: If a woman believes that perhaps Barack Obama and Harry Reid
are doing the country more harm than good — if a woman believes that
lower taxes are in fact a pretty important issue — that’s not a
disagreement: It’s a sign that something is “wrong with you.”
Pro-choice? Sure, but not when it comes to your politics — on that
subject, the Left is as anti-choice and ruthlessly conformist as it is
possible to be.
Who do Americans want to be when they grow up? Do women
aspire to a life like Julia’s, or to one more like that of Lieutenant
Colonel Joni Ernst? Would you rather be a sanctimonious sack of woe,
like Wendy Davis, or a happy warrior, like Mia Love? Would you rather
vote for a party that speaks to you as a citizen, family member,
entrepreneur, taxpayer, etc. — or one that insists you owe it not only
your
vote but your
obedience simply because you have a certain configuration of chromosomes or a certain surname?
It
is one of life’s little ironies that it is the feminists and the party
of so-called women’s issues who in the 21st century still have not quite
figured out that women are individuals, and that there is more to them
than the sum of their parts.
Read more of the article
here.